PROXY SUMMARY

 

 

 

This summary highlights certain information in this proxy statement in connection with our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). As it is only a summary and does not contain all of the information you should consider, please review the complete proxy statement before you vote. In this proxy statement, references to the “Company” and to “Synchrony” are to Synchrony Financial. For answers to frequently asked questions regarding the Annual Meeting, please refer to pages 67-69 of this proxy statement. Proxy materials are being mailed or made available to stockholders on or about April 6, 2020.

 

LOGISTICS
		DATE   May 21, 2020
		TIME   11:00 a.m. Eastern Time
		VIRTUAL MEETING WEBSITE ADDRESS   www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYF2020
		RECORD DATE   March 26, 2020

ELIGIBILITY TO VOTE

You are eligible to vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 26, 2020.

VOTING
		BY MAIL   You may date, sign and promptly return your proxy card by mail in a postage prepaid envelope (such proxy card must be received by May 20, 2020).
		BY TELEPHONE   You may use the toll-free telephone number shown on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) or proxy card up until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 20, 2020.
		BY THE INTERNET   In Advance   You may vote online by visiting the internet website address indicated on your Notice or proxy card or scan the QR code indicated on your Notice or proxy card with your mobile device, and follow the on-screen instructions until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 20, 2020.   At the Annual Meeting You may attend the virtual Annual Meeting by visiting this internet website address: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYF2020.

 

 

 

AGENDA

 

Election of 11 directors named in this proxy statement — Majority of votes cast Page Reference — 15 — Board Recommendation				Advisory approval of our named executive officers’ compensation — Majority of votes cast Page Reference — 30 — Board Recommendation				Ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020 — Majority of votes cast Page Reference — 63 — Board Recommendation
FOR				FOR				FOR

 

 

4        Synchrony   •  2020 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

We continue to value our stockholders’ perspectives on our strategy and governance practices. We believe that maintaining a dialogue with our stockholders allows us to better understand and respond to their perspectives on matters of importance to them. In 2019, we engaged with representatives of a majority of our outstanding shares on a variety of topics, including our growth plans, business strategy, board composition, governance and compensation practices and environmental and social issues.

BOARD’S ROLE IN STRATEGY

The Board actively oversees the Company’s strategic direction and the performance of our business and management. On an annual basis, the Board conducts an intensive, multi-day review of the Company’s short-, medium- and long-term strategic plan, taking into consideration economic, consumer, technology and other significant trends, as well as developments in the industry and regulatory initiatives. The Board’s input is then incorporated into the strategic plan and approved at the subsequent Board meeting. The output of these meetings provides the strategic context for the Board’s discussions at its meetings throughout the next year, including regular updates and feedback from the Board on the Company’s progress on its strategic plan and deep dives on developments in important areas such as cyber security. In addition, the Board regularly discusses and reviews feedback on strategy from our stockholders and other stakeholders, and often engages with internal and external experts and advisors to ensure our strategy reflects the latest competitive landscape.

At the 2019 annual three-day strategy meeting, the Board worked with management to build a strategic plan focusing on growing the core and diversifying the business. We are pleased to share the Company’s progress executing this plan:

Looking ahead, the Company remains focused on improving all aspects of the customer experience, starting with a quick, seamless account opening process all the way through account self-servicing features. We will continue to invest heavily in digital innovations to develop new products and services that drive deeper customer relationships.

BOARD REFRESHMENT

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee routinely assesses the composition of our Board to ensure that we have the right mix of skills and experience to maximize our Board’s potential and align our Board’s strengths with our strategic direction. To this end, the Board appointed Ellen Zane and Fernando Aguirre as new independent directors in February 2019 and July 2019, respectively. Ms. Zane has significant executive experience in the healthcare industry, specifically as the former CEO of a large teaching and research medical center, and brings a wealth of financial and other expertise to the Board. Mr. Aguirre has significant executive experience and expertise spanning leadership, strategy, digital marketing, branding, and communications.

Mr. Aguirre, 62, has been a director since July 2019. He served as President and CEO of Chiquita Brands International, Inc. from January 2004 to October 2012 and also served as Chairman from May 2004 to October 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Aguirre held various global marketing and management roles at Procter & Gamble from 1980 to 2004. Mr. Aguirre is currently on the boards of directors of CVS Health, a publicly-traded American healthcare company that owns CVS Pharmacy, CVS Caremark, and Aetna; and Barry Callebaut, a publicly-traded company which is one of the world’s largest cocoa processors and chocolate manufacturers. He previously served on other boards including Aetna, Inc., Coca-Cola Enterprises, and Levi Strauss & Co. Mr. Aguirre is currently the Owner & CEO of the Erie SeaWolves Minor League Baseball team, the double AA affiliate of the Detroit Tigers. He also owns a minority stake in the Myrtle Beach Pelicans, a high A affiliate of the Chicago Cubs. A native of Mexico, Mr. Aguirre is a prominent figure in the Hispanic community, recognized as one of the 100 Influentials by Hispanic Business Magazine and honored with the Hispanic Heritage Leadership Award by the NFL. Mr. Aguirre received a B.S. from Southern Illinois University Edwardsville.

We believe that Mr. Aguirre should serve as a member of the

Board due to his significant knowledge and experience in the areas of leadership, strategy, digital marketing, branding, and communications, as well as his extensive experience as a director of other publicly-traded companies.

Mr. Alves, 65, has been a director since November 2015 and was a non-voting Board observer from July 2015 to November 2015. He has also been a member of the board of directors of the Bank since January 2017. He served as Chief Sales Officer of Sprint Corporation, a wireless and wireline communications services provider, from January 2012 to September 2013 after serving as President of that company’s Business Markets Group from 2009 to 2012. Prior thereto, Mr. Alves held various positions at Sprint Corporation, including President, Sales and Distribution, from 2008 to 2009; President, South Region, from 2006 to 2008; Senior Vice President, Enterprise Markets, from 2005 to 2006; and President, Strategic Markets, from 2003 to 2005. Between 2002 and 2003, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Centennial Communications Corporation and from 2000 to 2001 served as President and CEO of PointOne Telecommunications, Inc. Mr. Alves currently serves on the boards of directors of Assurant, Inc., a publicly-traded global provider of risk management products and services; Yum! Brands, Inc., a company that develops, operates, franchises, and licenses a system of quick-service restaurants; and International Game Technology PLC, a manufacturer and distributor of microprocessor-based gaming and video lottery products and software systems. He previously served on the boards of directors of GTECH Holdings Corporation from 2005 to 2006, Herman Miller, Inc. from 2008 to 2010 and International Game Technology Inc. from 2010 to 2015. In 2017, Savoy magazine recognized Mr. Alves among Savoy’s 2017 Most Influential Black Corporate Directors. Mr. Alves received a B.S. in Industrial and Labor Relations and a J.D. from Cornell University.

We believe that Mr. Alves should serve as a member of the Board due to his executive management and leadership experience, including leadership roles with technology companies, his extensive background in sales, his financial expertise and his experience with strategic and business development. He also has experience with strategic corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions. The Board has determined that Mr. Alves qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d) (5) of Regulation S-K.

Mr. Coviello, 66, has been a director since November 2015 and was a non-voting Board observer from July 2015 to November 2015. He has also been a member of the board of directors of the Bank since January 2017. Since 2015 he has been an independent cyber security consultant. He served as Executive Vice President of EMC Corporation, a cloud computing and information security company, and Executive Chairman of RSA Security, Inc. (“RSA”), the Security Division of EMC Corporation and a provider of security, risk and compliance solutions, from 2011 to 2015, after serving as Executive Vice President and President of RSA from 2006 to 2011. Prior thereto, Mr. Coviello held various executive positions at RSA, including President and CEO from 2000 to 2006, and President from 1999 to 2000. Prior to RSA, he had extensive financial and operating management expertise in several technology companies. Mr. Coviello currently serves on the boards of directors of Tenable Holdings, Inc., a provider of Cyber Exposure solutions, which is a discipline for managing and measuring cyber security risk; and three private companies, ZeroNorth, a software and infrastructure security company that is the security industry’s first provider of orchestrated risk management; Capsule8, a security software platform for Linux, containers and micro-services; SecZetta, a provider of identity management software for governing and managing third party risk; and Bugcrowd, Inc., which uses tens of thousands of independent researchers to assist its customers in finding security vulnerabilities in their software. Mr. Coviello previously served on the boards of directors of EnerNOC, Inc., Gigamon, Inc., AtHoc, RSA, Sana Security, Inc. and Cylance, Inc. He received a B.B.A. in Accounting from the University of Massachusetts.

We believe that Mr. Coviello should serve as a member of the Board due to his leadership experience, including as CEO of a publicly-traded company, his extensive financial expertise and accounting background and his considerable experience in technology and cyber security.

Mr. Graylin, 51, has been a director since November 2015 and was a non-voting Board observer from July 2015 to November 2015. He has been Chairman and CEO of OV Loop, Inc., an Omni Commerce company with 1-Tap or Handsfree Messaging & Payments on virtually any device, anywhere, since 2018. He is also Executive Chairman and CEO of Indigo Technologies, Inc., a provider of breakthrough Ultra-Efficient EV & Energy Management technologies. Prior thereto, Mr. Graylin was Global Co-General Manager of Samsung Pay, the mobile payment platform of Samsung Electronics America, Inc., from February 2015 to April 2018. From 2012 to 2015, he was Founder and CEO of LoopPay, Inc., a mobile payment company; from 2007 to 2012, he was Founder and CEO of Roam Data, Inc., a developer of mobile point of sale software; from 2002 to 2007, he was Founder, Chairman and CEO of Way Systems, Inc.; and from 2000 to 2001, he was Founder and CEO of Entitlenet, Inc. Mr. Graylin served in the United States Navy as a Nuclear Submarine Officer from 1992 to 1998. He currently serves on the boards of directors of several privately held high-tech startups including: People Power, Inc., an IoT (internet of things) services company managed by artificial intelligence for home automation, security and senior care; PayFi, Inc., a real-time payment company; and Global Unites, a non-profit organization training and equipping youths on conflict transformation and reconciliation in 15 countries. Mr. Graylin is currently a Connection Science Fellow with MIT’s Media Lab, where he teaches part time on FinTech and Entrepreneurship. He received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and a B.A. in Chinese Linguistics and Literature from the University of Washington; an M.B.A. from the Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

We believe that Mr. Graylin should serve as a member of the Board due to his executive management and leadership experience, and his extensive background as an entrepreneur and innovator in technology.

Mr. Guthrie, 66, joined our Board and the board of directors of the Bank in connection with our initial public offering in July 2014 (the “IPO”). From October 2017 to September 2018, Mr. Guthrie served as CEO of Renovate America, Inc., a privately-owned financial services company. From July 2005 to January 2012, Mr. Guthrie served as Executive Vice President, and from July 2005 to May 2011 as CFO of Discover Financial Services, Inc., a direct banking and payments company. From September 2000 to July 2004, he served as President and CEO of various businesses of Citigroup Inc., including CitiFinancial International from 2000 to 2004 and CitiCapital from 2000 to 2001. From April 1978 to September 2000, Mr. Guthrie served in various roles of increasing responsibility at Associates First Capital Corporation. Mr. Guthrie serves on the boards of directors of Mr. Cooper Group, Inc., an originator and servicer of real estate mortgage loans; OneMain Holdings, Inc., a financial services company; and Renovate America Inc. He previously served on the boards of directors of LifeLock, Inc. and Garrison Capital Inc. During his tenure with Discover Financial Services, Inc., he also served on the board of directors of Discover Bank. Mr. Guthrie received a B.A. in Economics from Hanover College and an M.B.A. from Drake University.

We believe that Mr. Guthrie should serve as a member of the Board due to his leadership experience, including as CFO of two publicly-traded companies and as a director of other publicly-traded companies, financial expertise and accounting background, risk management experience and extensive experience in consumer finance (including the private-label credit card industry), including more than 30 years of experience in finance and/or operating roles.

Mr. Hartnack, 74, joined our Board and the board of directors of the Bank in connection with the IPO in July 2014 and serves as the nonexecutive Chair of the Board. From April 2005 to February 2013, Mr. Hartnack served as Vice Chairman and Head, Consumer and Small Business Banking of U.S. Bancorp, a financial services holding company. From June 1991 to March 2005, Mr. Hartnack served in various leadership roles at Union Bank, N.A. (formerly known as Union Bank of California, N.A.), including Vice Chairman, Director and Head, Community Banking and Investment Services from 1999 to 2005. From June 1982 to May 1991, Mr. Hartnack served in various leadership roles at First Chicago Corporation, including Executive Vice President and Head, Community Banking. Mr. Hartnack previously served on the boards of directors of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Mastercard International, Inc. (U.S. Region) and UnionBanCal Corporation. Mr. Hartnack received a B.A. in Economics from the University of California, Los Angeles, and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.

We believe that Mr. Hartnack should serve as a member of the Board due to his leadership experience and extensive background in consumer finance, banking and financial services regulatory matters that he accumulated over the course of a 40-year career in the banking industry.

QUALIFICATIONS OF DIRECTORS

Directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the stockholders. They must also have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. The Company will endeavor to have a Board representing a range of experience at policy-making levels in areas that are relevant to the Company’s activities. Although the Board does not have a specific diversity policy, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account a candidate’s ability to contribute to the diversity on the Board. It considers each candidate’s and the existing Board members’ race, ethnicity, gender, age, cultural background and professional experience. Directors must be willing to devote sufficient time to carrying out their duties and responsibilities effectively and should be committed to serve on the Board for an extended period of time. Our Governance Principles maintain that directors who also serve as CEOs or in equivalent positions should not serve on more than two boards of public companies in addition to the Company’s Board, and other directors should not serve on more than three boards of public companies in addition to the Company’s Board.

Pursuant to our Company’s Governance Principles, when a director’s principal occupation or job responsibilities change significantly during his or her tenure as a director, that director shall tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board the action, if any, to be taken with respect to the resignation. The Board does not believe that arbitrary term limits on directors’ service are appropriate, nor does it believe that directors should expect to be renominated annually until they reach the mandatory retirement age. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate each director in connection with his or her renomination for election at each annual meeting of stockholders. Except in special circumstances, directors will not be nominated for election to the Board after their 75th birthday.

PROCESS FOR REVIEWING, IDENTIFYING AND EVALUATING DIRECTOR NOMINEES

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing, identifying, evaluating and recommending director nominees to the Board after considering the qualifications described above and set forth in the Company’s Governance Principles. Upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board proposes a slate of nominees to the stockholders for election to the Board. Between annual stockholder meetings, the Board may fill vacancies and newly created directorships on the Board with directors who will serve until the next annual meeting.

Other stockholders may also propose nominees for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by submitting the names and other supporting information required under our Bylaws to: Corporate Secretary, Synchrony Financial, 777 Long Ridge Road, Stamford, Connecticut 06902. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will apply the same standards in considering director candidates recommended by stockholders that it applies to other candidates. In addition to recommending director candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, stockholders may also, pursuant to procedures established in our Bylaws, directly nominate one or more director candidates to stand for election by the stockholders. For information on how to nominate a person for election as a director at the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including through the proxy access right to include such nominees in the Company’s proxy materials, please see the discussion under the heading “Additional Information— Stockholder Proposals for the 2021 Annual Meeting.”

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Board has determined that each of Mr. Naylor, Mr. Alves and Ms. Zane qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d) (5) of Regulation S-K, and the Board is satisfied that all members of our Audit Committee have sufficient expertise and business and financial experience necessary to effectively perform their duties as members of the Audit Committee.

MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Each of Mr. Hartnack, Mr. Aguirre, Mr. Naylor and Ms. Richie qualifies as “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and as “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act).

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE AND ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT

The Board is led by our non-executive Chair, Mr. Hartnack. We believe that having an independent director serve as the non-executive Chair of the Board is in the best interests of our stockholders. The separation of roles allows our Chair to focus on the organization and effectiveness of the Board. At the same time, it allows our CEO to focus on executing our strategy and managing our operations, performance and risks.

We manage enterprise risk using an integrated framework that includes Board-level oversight, administration by a group of cross-functional management committees, and day-to-day implementation by a dedicated risk management team led by the CRO. The Board (with input from the Risk Committee) is responsible for approving the Company’s enterprise-wide risk appetite statement and framework, as well as certain other risk management policies, and oversees the Company’s strategic plan and enterprise-wide risk management program.

The Board regularly devotes time during its meetings to review and discuss the most significant risks facing the Company and management’s responses to those risks. During these discussions, the CEO, the CFO, the CRO, the General Counsel and other members of senior management present management’s assessment of risks, a description of the most significant risks facing the Company and any mitigating factors and plans or practices in place to address and monitor those risks. The Board has also delegated certain of its risk oversight responsibilities to its committees.

The Risk Committee of the Board has responsibility for the oversight of the risk management program, and the three other board committees have other oversight roles with respect to risk management within their respective oversight areas. Several management committees and subcommittees have important roles and responsibilities in administering the risk management program. This committee-focused governance structure provides a forum through which risk expertise is applied cross-functionally to all major decisions, including development of policies, processes and controls used by the CRO and risk management team to execute our risk management philosophy. The enterprise risk management philosophy is to ensure that all relevant risks are appropriately identified, measured, monitored and

controlled. The approach in executing this philosophy focuses on leveraging risk expertise to drive enterprise risk management using a strong governance framework structure, a comprehensive enterprise risk assessment program and an effective risk appetite framework.

Responsibility for risk management flows to individuals and entities throughout our Company, including the Board, various Board and management committees and senior management. The corporate culture and values, in conjunction with the risk management accountability incorporated into the integrated Enterprise Risk Government Framework, which includes a governance structure and three distinct “Lines of Defense” (as further described below), has facilitated, and will continue to facilitate, the evolution of an effective risk management presence across the Company.

The “First Line of Defense” is comprised of the business areas whose day-to-day activities involve decision-making and associated risk taking for the Company. As the business owner, the first line is responsible for identifying, assessing, managing and controlling that risk, and for mitigating our overall risk exposure. The first line formulates strategy and operates within the risk appetite and risk governance framework. The “Second Line of Defense,” also known as the independent risk management organization, provides oversight of first line risk taking and management. The second line assists in determining risk capacity, risk appetite, and the strategies, policies and structure for managing risks. The second line owns the risk governance framework. The “Third Line of Defense” is comprised of Internal Audit. The third line provides independent and objective assurance to senior management and to the Board and Audit Committee that first and second line risk management and internal control systems and its governance processes are well-designed and working as intended.

ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS

It is our policy that each director is expected to dedicate sufficient time to the performance of his or her duties as a director, including by attending meetings of the stockholders, and meetings of the Board and Board committees of which he or she is a member.

In 2019, the Board held nine meetings, including regularly scheduled and special meetings. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board (held during the period for which he or she has been a director); and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees on which he or she served (during the periods for which he or she has served). All directors attended the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

SYNCHRONY PROGRAM PRINCIPLES

Synchrony’s executive compensation program is intended to discourage excessive or imprudent risk taking while at the same time promoting and supporting the key principles outlined below. The program is also designed to be consistent with our safety and soundness and to identify, measure, monitor and control incentive compensation arrangements.

The key principles guiding this program and underlying the oversight of our program by Synchrony’s MDCC are:

The consistent application of these design principles enables Synchrony to maintain compensation programs that are reasonable, balanced and effectively attract, retain, motivate and engage employees to achieve the mission, goals and objectives of Synchrony in a way that is compatible with effective risk management controls and long- term stockholder value. A robust performance review process is a critical element in all reward decisions.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS IN SETTING COMPENSATION

For 2019, we used the following considerations in setting compensation for our NEOs:

Consistent and Sustainable Performance—Our executive compensation program provides the greatest pay opportunity when executives demonstrate superior performance for sustained periods of time. It also rewards executives for executing our Company’s strategy through business cycles, so that the achievement of long-term strategic objectives is not compromised by short-term considerations. The emphasis on consistent performance affects annual salary and equity incentive compensation. With the prior year’s salary and grant serving as an initial basis for consideration, the final determinations for salary and grants are based on an assessment of an executive’s past performance and expected future contributions. Because current-year, past and sustainable performance are incorporated into compensation decisions, any percentage increase or decrease in the amount of total annual compensation tends to be more gradual than in a framework that is focused solely or largely on current-year performance.

Balanced Compensation Approach—We strive to provide an appropriate mix of compensation elements to achieve a balance between short versus long-term compensation, cash versus equity incentive compensation and other features that cause the amounts ultimately received by the NEOs to appropriately reflect risk and risk outcomes. Cash payments primarily, but not exclusively, reward more recent performance, whereas equity awards encourage our NEOs to continue to deliver results over a longer period of time, align our executives’ interests with the interests of our stockholders and serve as a retention tool. We believe that the compensation paid or awarded to our NEOs should be more heavily weighted toward rewards based on our Company’s sustained operating performance against both internal goals and relative to peers, as well as our stock price performance over the long-term.

Qualitative and Quantitative Factors—Quantitative formulas are not used exclusively in determining the amount of compensation. While quantitative calculations and formulas set the funding and cap award levels for our performance-based programs, the MDCC can use qualitative factors such as performance in the context of the economic environment relative to other companies, risk considerations, execution of our strategic plan and leadership competencies/values.

Risk Mitigation—Our compensation program is balanced, focused on the long-term and takes into consideration the full range and duration of risks associated with an NEO’s activities. Under this structure, through clawback policies and other program features, the highest amount of compensation can be achieved through consistent superior performance but only within the limits of our stated risk appetite. In addition, significant portions of compensation are earned only over the longer term and may be adjusted during the vesting period for risk outcomes. This provides strong incentives for executives to manage our Company for the long-term while avoiding excessive risk taking in the short-term. As discussed further below under “Compensation and Risk,” Synchrony’s MDCC reviews the relationship between our risk management policies and practices and the incentive compensation provided to our NEOs.

Peer Company Pay—We also considered compensation levels and pay practices at our direct peers and other peer companies when setting target pay levels for 2019, targeting median pay among peers with additional consideration based on the size, scope and impact of the executive’s role, market data, leadership skills, length of service and individual performance and contributions. The peer group was selected to reflect publicly-traded financial services companies headquartered in the United States considering assets, annual revenue and market capitalization equal to approximately one-half to two-times Synchrony’s size. At the time of the peer group selection, Synchrony was at the peer 42nd percentile in assets, 52nd percentile in revenue and 45th percentile in market capitalization, based on financial information from the most recent fiscal year prior to the meeting.

For 2019, upon the recommendation of Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), the MDCC’s new independent advisor, the MDCC updated Synchrony’s peer group to include more data processors and consumer finance companies (Santander Consumer USA Holdings, Fidelity National Information Services, Alliance Data Systems, Fiserv, and Total System Services) and eliminate banks with limited consumer focus to help balance the mix of peers across the industry (i.e., The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and Comerica Incorporated). As a result, the list of peer companies used to set pay levels for 2019, as set forth below, better reflects our business model.

2019 OTHER NEO ACHIEVEMENTS

MR. DOUBLES

In addition to Mr. Doubles’ contributions toward our Company’s objectives described above, Mr. Doubles effectively transitioned to his new role as President and his impact in this role was positively felt across the Company. Mr. Doubles immersed himself in his new responsibilities and played a key leadership role in driving growth, new deals and making key investment decisions, positively impacting all three platforms. Mr. Doubles has had significant influence over our strategic growth initiatives and direct to consumer strategy, leading investment decisions to support diversification and launch the Synchrony Mastercard program. Beyond his impacts to the business results, Mr. Doubles led efforts to improve talent and strengthen our culture, focusing on diverse talent recruitment, performance management and driving adoption of “Acting as An Owners” mindset. Mr. Doubles created and executed a robust development plan to ensure he continued building relationships with key external stakeholders (partners, regulators, stockholders, government relations) and employees across the Company.

MR. WENZEL

Mr. Wenzel transitioned from Deputy CFO to CFO very well. In addition to his contributions toward our Company’s objectives described above, Mr. Wenzel provided strong leadership of our finance organization, including driving excellent financial discipline across the business and leading his team to add value in new ways; playing a key role in new program wins and renewals; supporting growth and strategic investment opportunities; maintaining strong controllership and risk management; driving strong deposit growth; increasing Synchrony’s dividend and share repurchase program; maintaining strong investor relations; further expanding his relationships with our key customers; and promoting career development and diversity.

MR. GREIG

In addition to Mr. Greig’s contributions toward our Company’s objectives described above, Mr. Greig provided strong leadership of the Credit and Capital Management organization, including delivering on critical credit loss and fraud metrics while supporting strategic business initiatives to drive smart growth and enhance the consumer experience. This performance led to improved net losses and reserve metrics compared to the operating plan, which had a direct positive impact on the Company’s net earnings in 2019.

OTHER COMPENSATION PRACTICES

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

Our Stock Ownership Guidelines require the Company’s CEO, President and Executive Vice Presidents to own significant amounts of our common stock, helping to ensure alignment of executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. The enhanced stock ownership guideline for our CEO is six times base salary and for our President is five times base salary. The stock ownership guideline for Executive Vice Presidents, including the other four NEOs, is three times base salary. The guidelines are to be met within five years of being subject to the policy and/or promotion. For the purposes of our stock ownership guidelines, all shares of common stock, RSUs and phantom stock units held by our executives are credited toward ownership levels. All of our NEOs’ stock ownership far exceeds the ownership guidelines, aligning our executive team with our stockholders. Based on our closing stock price on February 28, 2020 of $29.10, our NEOs had the following ownership base-salary multiples:

ANTI-HEDGING AND

ANTI-PLEDGING RESTRICTIONS

Our Code of Conduct, which applies to all of our employees (including officers) and directors, includes anti-hedging provisions that prohibit all employees and directors from engaging in transactions in derivatives of or short-selling of Synchrony securities, including buying and writing options. We also maintain an anti-pledging policy that prohibits employees and directors from pledging activity in Synchrony securities.

CLAWBACK POLICY

In 2018, the MDCC expanded the existing clawback policy beyond conduct detrimental to the Company, to include “no fault” financial restatements for all of our named executive officers. Under the revised policy, in the event that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the Company will take action to recover from any current or former executive officer who received any annual or long-term incentive compensation paid, awarded, or granted during the three-year period preceding the date on which the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement, based on the erroneous data, in excess of what would have been paid to the executive officer under the accounting restatement.

Additionally, under the Company’s policy, if it is determined that an employee at or above a designated executive grade under the Company’s compensation structure has engaged in conduct detrimental to the Company, the Bank or any of the Company’s other subsidiaries, the MDCC or, in the case of a Bank employee, the Bank’s Development and Compensation Committee, may take a range of actions to remedy the misconduct, prevent its recurrence, and impose such discipline as would be appropriate. Discipline may vary depending on the facts and circumstances, and may include, without limitation, (a) termination of employment, (b) initiating an action for breach of fiduciary duty, (c) reducing, cancelling or seeking reimbursement of any paid or awarded compensation, and (d) if the conduct resulted in a material inaccuracy in the Company’s financial statements or performance metrics that affects the executive’s compensation, seeking reimbursement of any portion of incentive compensation paid or awarded to the executive that is greater than what would have been paid or awarded if calculated based on the accurate financial statements or performance metrics. If it is determined that an executive engaged in fraudulent misconduct, the MDCC or, in the case of a Bank employee, the Bank’s Development and Compensation Committee, will seek such reimbursement. These remedies would be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any actions imposed by law enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities, or as otherwise required by any agreement with a stock exchange on which the Company’s securities are listed.

TAX CONSIDERATIONS

Prior to December 22, 2017 when the Tax Act was signed into law, Section 162(m) of the Code provided that no U.S. income tax deduction was allowable to a publicly held corporation for non-performance-based compensation in excess of $1 million paid to a “covered employee” (generally, the NEOs other than the CFO).

The Tax Act includes numerous changes to existing law, including (1) eliminating the exclusions for commissions or performance-based compensation paid to “covered employees” under Code Section 162(m), (2) expanding the definition of “covered employee” to include anyone serving as CFO or CEO at any point during the year, as well as the three most highly compensated officers, and (3) providing that status as a covered employee continues to apply if the person was ever a covered employee for years ending after December 31, 2016. The Act is effective for tax years beginning after 2017, though it includes a transition rule for compensation paid pursuant to certain written binding contracts in place on November 2, 2017 which are not materially modified. Where we believe awards or payments are eligible for relief under this transition rule, our policy generally is to preserve that eligibility.

Our policy generally had been to seek to qualify various elements of the compensation payable to executives as “performance-based compensation” to the extent possible. However, as described above, the exemptions from Section 162(m)’s deduction limit have been eliminated as a result of the Tax Act, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, such that all compensation paid to our covered executive officers (including the CFO) in excess of $1 million will not be deductible unless it qualifies for the transition relief referenced above.

Although the MDCC has historically intended to structure various elements of the compensation payable to executives in a manner intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m), because of ambiguities and uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m) and the proposed regulations issued thereunder, including the uncertain scope of the transition relief under the Tax Act, no assurance can be given that compensation intended to satisfy the requirements for exemption from Section 162(m) in fact will satisfy such requirements. Further, the MDCC reserves the right to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) if it determines that such modifications are consistent with our business needs.

Richard C. Hartnack, Chair

Fernando Aguirre

Jeffrey G. Naylor

Laurel J. Richie